The fall of the agency
Five
years ago, I found myself as an executive of an ad serving business
in Europe, competing against the likes of Atlas and DoubleClick for
mostly agency clients. The pitch was about delivery speed, reporting
functionality, and how quickly one could traffic 30 placements with
20 creatives after a martini lunch. The agencies spoke our language
and the brands did not, allowing the agencies to not only make a
handsome profit from our technology (often $0.05 to $0.50 CPM above
cost), but also to own the client's data and the pixels on their
site, making it hard for the client to move their account in the
future.
Most clients failed to understand why that could become a problem, and most agencies failed to see how quickly it would change. By my estimation, ad serving contracts have gone from being 90 percent held by agencies just five years ago to perhaps only 30 to 40 percent today.
The
enablers of this change are the demystification of what ad serving is
and the influx of cheap labor that understands how to use it. Ask
most CMOs and they can tell you their ad server gives them
independent reporting, view-thru measurement, and campaign
management. And chances are they've found a low(er)-cost resource to
manage the entire process for them.
More
importantly, ask the smart CMOs and they will tell you that taking
control of their ad serving gives them the power to switch agencies
if and when they want to without losing historical data or needing to
re-pixel their website. To this day, Dart does not have a feature for
porting a client out of one agency's account into another's, and
probably with good reason.
Meanwhile,
ad serving isn't the only aspect of digital marketing that CMOs are
looking to bring in house. Brands are now also well positioned to
negotiate the best rates. While some agencies still hold guaranteed
access to certain inventory sources at preferred rates, the
percentage of media that is being bought through auction tools is
rising sharply, and where an auction exists, so does "equal"
access (and therefore CPMs).
No comments:
Post a Comment